NIH планирует ограничить грант Pathway to Independence только гражданами США и постоянными резидентами

NIH Plans to Bar Scientists on Visas from the Award That Launches Independent Labs The National Institutes of Health plans to restrict eligibility for its Pathway to Independence award to U.S. citizens, permanent residents, and noncitizen nationals, closing one of the few federal funding routes historically open to international scientists working in American labs on temporary visas. The plan appears in an internal presentation reviewed by STAT, which reported it last week. The agency has not published a formal notice changing the policy, and the current program announcement still states there is no citizenship requirement for K99 candidates. The award, known as the K99/R00, is unusual in its scope. It funds up to two years of mentored postdoctoral work followed by up to three years of independent support once the recipient secures a faculty position. That structure is the reason the change matters more than its dollar value suggests. The Bottleneck the Award Was Built to Solve Biomedical careers have a specific structural chokepoint, and it is not the doctorate. It is the transition from postdoctoral researcher to independent lab head. A postdoc works on a senior investigator's grant, on that investigator's questions. To be hired as faculty, the same person must demonstrate an independent research program, which normally requires funding, which normally requires a faculty appointment. The circularity is the problem. The K99/R00 breaks it by attaching money to the person rather than the position. A recipient arrives at a job interview with committed federal support that travels with them, changing the calculation for a hiring department. The award's stated purpose is to help postdoctoral researchers transition in a timely manner to independent, tenure-track or equivalent faculty positions. Under current program rules, candidates may have no more than four years of counted postdoctoral research experience, and applications on behalf of noncitizens with temporary visas require the institution to document that the visa allows the candidate to remain long enough to complete each phase of the award. The Rule It Would Bring into Line The proposed restriction would not create a new standard so much as extend an existing one. Most NIH career development awards are already limited to citizens, permanent residents, and lawful permanent residents. The agency's grants policy statement makes the point explicitly: for career development programs other than K99/R00, individuals on temporary or student visas are not eligible to apply unless they have begun the permanent residence process and expect to be admitted by the earliest possible award date. The application form's option for a noncitizen with a temporary visa applies only to K99/R00 candidates. The K99 has been the exception. Removing it would align the program with the rest of the career development portfolio and remove the one federal transition award that a postdoc on a temporary visa could realistically pursue. There is a practical argument for the restriction that should be stated fairly. The award commits five years of funding, and visa status can change during that window. An institution must attest that a candidate's visa permits them to remain, but that attestation is a forecast, not a guarantee. Restricting eligibility reduces the risk of committing funds that cannot be used. Where the Effects Would Land Hardest International researchers make up a substantial share of the American biomedical postdoctoral workforce, concentrated in research-intensive institutions clustered around Boston, New York, Baltimore, the San Francisco Bay Area, Chicago, Houston, and San Diego. Those cities are where laboratory hiring and university budgets would feel a change first. The immediate effect would fall on people whose careers are already in motion: postdocs partway through a four-year eligibility window who had planned an application around it. The eligibility clock does not pause, and NIH has issued short-term extensions of that window for applicants affected by disruptions due to a lapse in federal appropriations, underscoring how tightly the timing runs. Departments would feel it second. A hiring committee weighing two comparable candidates, one carrying committed federal funding and one not, has a straightforward decision. Removing a category of candidates from access to that funding changes who gets shortlisted, independent of the science. For the public, the connection is real but indirect and should not be overstated. Who runs a lab in five years shapes which questions get asked, and biomedical research questions eventually become treatments and guidelines. That pathway is long, and no one can quantify what a single eligibility change would mean for any specific disease area. Details the Agency Has Not Settled Several things are not yet established. The agency has not published a notice, so the effective date, whether current awardees would be affected, and whether applications already submitted would be grandfathered are all unknown. Nor is it clear whether the change would apply uniformly across NIH institutes. The National Cancer Institute left the parent program at the end of 2024 and runs its own announcements with different eligibility rules, including a longer postdoctoral window, so institute-level variation is possible. The agency has not publicly explained its reasoning, and a document viewed by a reporter is not the same as a published policy. Internal plans are revised and sometimes abandoned before they reach the Federal Register. Until a notice appears in the NIH Guide, the current rules remain in effect, and applicants should not assume either that the change is settled or that it will not happen. Postdocs on temporary visas who are considering an application should watch the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts for a formal notice and consult their institution's research administration office, which will receive guidance directly. Other funding routes exist, including private foundation career-transition awards and institutional bridge programs, though none share the same portable structure. MedicalDaily will report a formal NIH notice if one is issued, along with any agency statement on timing or transition provisions. Key Questions Answered What is the K99/R00 award? The NIH Pathway to Independence award, which funds up to two years of mentored postdoctoral research followed by up to three years of independent support after the recipient secures a faculty position. What is changing? NIH plans to limit eligibility to U.S. citizens, permanent residents and noncitizen nationals, according to an internal presentation reported by STAT. Is the change official? No. The agency has not published a formal notice, and current program announcements still state there is no citizenship requirement for K99 candidates. Why does this award matter more than others? It attaches funding to the researcher rather than the institution, so a candidate can carry committed support into a faculty job search. Are other NIH career awards already restricted? Yes. Most career development awards are closed to people on temporary or student visas. The K99/R00 has been the exception. Who would be affected first? Postdoctoral researchers on temporary visas are partway through the four-year eligibility window, particularly at research-intensive institutions in major metropolitan areas. What should affected researchers do? Watch the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts for formal notices, and consult your institution's research administration office. Published by Medicaldaily.com