Ученые из NIST разработали метод сверхточного измерения микроскопических скоростей потока жидкостей

Just a Standard Blog When doctors need to deliver precise doses of medicine on a strict schedule, they often administer it intravenously. Intravenous drug delivery methods need to carefully control the flow of medicine into a patient. Knowing the medicine’s flow rate — or the volume of fluid flowing into the patient each second or minute — is crucial to delivering the right amount of medicine at the right time. Surprisingly, the correct amount is sometimes not very much at all. Imagine a one-liter bottle divided up into a billion parts. One of those parts is a nanoliter. Doctors may only need a handful of nanoliters of fluid to flow each minute. Fluid flowing at the rate of one nanoliter per minute, in the words of NIST biomedical engineer and specialist in ultra-tiny technology Greg Cooksey, is like “draining a can of Coke through a hair if it were a straw, over about 700 years.” Cooksey works to improve how we measure these super-slow flow rates. Currently, the devices we use to measure flow rate, called “flowmeters,” can be slow, fickle or imprecise when used on nanoliter-per-minute flows. In addition to more accurately measuring drug delivery, a better measurement technique for such slow flows would improve a range of other technologies. In medicine, emerging technologies manipulate individual biological cells, requiring precise control over the flow of nanoliters of fluid. In chemistry, precise slow-flow measurements could improve widely used techniques for separating and identifying the components of unknown substances, such as those used to detect performance-enhancing drugs in athletes’ blood. But how does Cooksey’s flowmeter break through the nanoliter-per-minute barrier? With lasers and clever mathematics. I worked to improve this math as an intern in the Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship (SURF) program here at NIST. When fluorescent dye molecules absorb light, they re-emit that light. (The dye glows!) But it can't keep that up forever. Once a molecule has absorbed and re-emitted light enough times, it stops and goes dark. Scientists call this process “photobleaching” and have a strong understanding of how long it takes. Cooksey and his team’s flowmeter takes advantage of photobleaching’s predictability. They first add a dash of fluorescent dye to the fluid they’re measuring. They then run the mix through a thin tube. As it creeps along, they fire a laser at it. This makes the dye glow until it goes dark. Then, they learn the flow rate by measuring the amount of light the dye re-emits. Here's the trick. The amount of light the dye emits depends on how much it has photobleached. The extent of photobleaching depends on how long the dye has been in the laser beam. That varies based on how fast the fluid moves. Slow flow means more dye molecules get fried and less glow. Faster flow means fewer dye molecules get fried and more glow. So, by measuring the amount of light the fluorescent particles re-emit, they can measure the flow rate. A broad-strokes description of how glow relates to flow rate is useful, but Cooksey and his team needed to better understand their relationship to make this technology work. That’s where I come in. As part of the SURF program, I worked with postdoctoral researcher Alli Carson to simulate the movement of dye through the flowmeter to better understand tiny changes in the movement of liquid. I developed a simulation using specialized mathematical techniques. This work allowed the experimental team to better know what to expect when the flow rate has small variations. Hopefully, that’ll help them develop a flowmeter that makes measuring changes in super-slow flows feasible. For me, working with NIST’s range of world-class researchers was its own reward. Most gratifying of all, however, was NIST’s willingness to work across research areas to accomplish the goal. The experience also solidified my plans to pursue a graduate degree in applied math. Going into the SURF program, I wasn’t sure if that was for me. My exposure to a lively research environment at NIST has both prepared and excited me to pursue applied math at a high level. What I liked best, however, was working so directly with the people who use applied math and seeing how my work would benefit others.