Юристы оценили перспективы закона о кубинцах: угроза отмены в ближайшем будущем маловероятна

Immigration attorney John Dutton from John Dutton Law PLLC in Houston, Texas, acknowledged the uncertainty surrounding the future of the Cuban Adjustment Act amidst current U.S. immigration policies. Nevertheless, his colleague Johan de Rojas offered a more optimistic view, suggesting that no detrimental changes are likely in the immediate future. This week, Tania Costa interviewed both lawyers on CiberCuba, where they discussed the legal status of Cubans with various immigration documents in that jurisdiction. Legal Experts Discuss the Future of the Cuban Adjustment Act When questioned about the potential threats to the Cuban Adjustment Act under current governmental pressures, Dutton, through De Rojas as his interpreter, responded cautiously: "That's an excellent question. I can't predict what will happen to the Cuban Adjustment Act in the future." De Rojas elaborated on Dutton's position, adding his own perspective: "He doesn't want to make any claims about the future because it's uncertain, depending on developments between Cuba and the United States and the situation of those in the U.S. seeking status adjustment under the Cuban Adjustment Act." Understanding the Legislative Context The attorneys emphasized the importance of legislative processes in maintaining the law. "Many things would need to happen, as everyone knows, and it would take a considerable amount of time and Congressional approval for any changes to occur," De Rojas noted. This legislative safeguard is crucial. Enacted in 1966, the Cuban Adjustment Act can only be amended or repealed by the U.S. Congress, as no president has the authority to eliminate it through an executive order. Judicial Challenges and the Uncertain Future One significant area of concern highlighted by John Dutton Law involves the ongoing legal battles over the I-220A form, an ICE supervision release order that the federal government does not recognize as equivalent to the parole needed to activate status adjustment rights. The pivotal case, Bello-Rubio v. Noem, filed by 992 Cubans in the Southern District of Florida, aims to have the I-220A legally recognized as parole. This crucial hearing has been postponed twice in Miami, with the next session scheduled for September 2026, leaving thousands of Cubans in a state of uncertainty. In July, judges in Orlando, New Orleans, and San Antonio granted residency to Cubans with I-220A, but these decisions have been appealed by the federal government, further complicating the situation. The perspective of Dutton and De Rojas aligns with other experts in the field. One described the Cuban Adjustment Act as "a cockroach that could survive a nuclear bomb," emphasizing its resilience in the short term, while cautioning about practical risks for particular groups of Cuban migrants based on their entry methods and documentation. The consensus among immigration attorneys consulted in 2026 indicates that while the law doesn't face imminent legislative repeal, the administrative and judicial landscape poses genuine risks for those with I-220A, whose fate hinges significantly on court rulings in pending cases. The evolving nature of the Cuban Adjustment Act and other issues impacting Cubans in the U.S. remains dynamic. Stay updated with our U.S. Immigration section. Frequently Asked Questions about the Cuban Adjustment Act What is the Cuban Adjustment Act? The Cuban Adjustment Act, enacted in 1966, allows Cuban nationals in the U.S. to apply for permanent residency after one year of being admitted or paroled. Can the Cuban Adjustment Act be repealed? The Act can only be amended or repealed by the U.S. Congress. It cannot be eliminated through a presidential executive order. What is the significance of the I-220A form? The I-220A form is an ICE supervision release order that is not recognized as parole by the federal government, which is necessary for status adjustment under the Cuban Adjustment Act.