Хьюстон продал 1400 акров земли, закупленной под строительство третьего аэропорта, уполномочив округ Уоллер создать парки и системы управления паводками

Houston has finally let go of a piece of land it never knew what to do with. In 1986, the city paid $5.7 million for 1,400 acres near Brookshire on the Katy Prairie, intending to build a third major airport to ease pressure on Bush Intercontinental and Hobby. That plan never got close to a runway. Environmentalists warned the site sat in the middle of one of the region's busiest wintering grounds for geese and waterfowl, developers and officials spent years arguing over the numbers, and the oil bust of the 1980s quietly killed off the demand the airport was meant to serve. By the late 1990s, the project was dead in all but name. Now, nearly forty years after the land was bought, Houston City Council has sold it on to Waller County for $19.7 million, not for aircraft, but for parks, wetlands and flood control. The sale marks an unusual end to a decades-old airport proposal, transforming land once reserved for aviation into space for public and environmental uses. Waller County plans to preserve much of the property while exploring detention basins, lakes and other projects aimed at managing regional drainage. Why was Houston’s 1,400-acre airport never built According to the Houston Chronicle, the Westside Airport was originally envisioned as a substantial aviation hub, with city officials and landowners planning parallel runways, advanced landing systems and hundreds of hangars, comparable in scale to Hobby Airport. However, the ambitious proposal quickly ran into resistance from Katy residents, private airport operators and environmental groups who raised concerns about the project's impact on the surrounding area. Environmental objections proved particularly significant. 1988 report by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service found that the proposed site was within one of the most active wintering areas for migratory waterfowl in the region. A consultant recorded nearly 600 geese passing over the site every hour, and federal wildlife officials estimated the airport could face as many as 50 bird strikes a month, prompting the FAA to require a full environmental impact statement before any development could proceed. Image AI generated Why did Houston abandon the Westside Airport According to the Houston Press, beyond ecological concerns, the airport plan was also driven by shifting economics. The oil downturn of the 1980s slowed corporate aviation activity and eroded the demand forecasts that had originally justified the project, according to FAA planning documents and Houston Chronicle reporting from the period. By the late 1990s, the Houston Airport System had determined that its existing facilities offered sufficient capacity for the long term, removing the practical rationale for a third airport. In the 1998 annual report, then-Mayor Lee Brown formally ended the Westside Airport proposal, recommending instead that the land be used for wetlands mitigation. Why is Houston selling the 1,400-acre property For Waller County, the sale marks an unexpected turn. Duhon said the county had not anticipated that Houston would ever part with the property, noting that officials had long assumed the Houston Airport System intended to retain it. Around 600 acres of the tract are already under a conservation easement, which will continue to shape how the land can be developed, though Duhon noted the county can still pursue projects such as regional detention basins or lakes within those restrictions to help manage drainage in an area he said needs it. The land is also expected to form the basis of Waller County's first county park system, an area the county currently lacks despite anticipated population growth. Duhon said the ambition is to give residents a way to enjoy the Katy Prairie itself, through activities such as fishing, picnicking and horse riding. Houston officials have linked the sale to the city's broader financial pressures, with Duhon noting that the city is working to secure revenue for essential services, including waste collection and other municipal needs.